The design thinking mindset: An assessment of what we know and what we see in practice

نویسنده

  • Jochen Schweitzer
چکیده

In this paper, we provide a comprehensive assessment of the design thinking mindset. First, we review the design and management literature to identify and define key cognitive and behavioural components of a design thinking mindset, before we report our initial findings from 15 in-depth interviews with innovation managers in Australia and Germany who reflect on their practices while implementing design thinking within their organizations. Our explorative study confirms a set of commonly understood and applied mindsets, but also reveals the impact of organisational constraints on translating cognition into behaviour. We suggest to further map the different mindsets used in design thinking projects and link them to extant leadership theory, which – as we argue – provides a suitable point of departure for further study of the design thinking mindset and its role for innovation.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

CONCEPTUAL PROCESS OF DESIGN THINKING ACCORDING TO CONTEMPORARY ACTIVITIES

  In this paper, authors tackle three very important questions that need to be answered if a theory of design is to be constructed. The first is what designers do, Which we attempt to illustrate with the help of case studies and theories of design practice. The second question is what guides designers. Here, authors try to present some of the proposed normative positions about design, to show t...

متن کامل

CONCEPTUAL PROCESS OF DESIGN THINKING ACCORDING TO CONTEMPORARY ACTIVITIES

  In this paper, authors tackle three very important questions that need to be answered if a theory of design is to be constructed. The first is what designers do, Which we attempt to illustrate with the help of case studies and theories of design practice. The second question is what guides designers. Here, authors try to present some of the proposed normative positions about design, to show t...

متن کامل

It Ain’t What You Do (But the Way That You Do It): Will Safety II Transform the Way We Do Patient Safety; Comment on “False Dawns and New Horizons in Patient Safety Research and Practice”

Mannion and Braithwaite outline a new paradigm for studying and improving patient safety – Safety II. In this response, I argue that Safety I should not be dismissed simply because the safety management strategies that are developed and enacted in the name of Safety I are not always true to the original philosophy of ‘systems thinking.’

متن کامل

ابهام زدایی از تفکر طراحی و شاخص های آن

Design thinking attends to designing manners to figure out common patterns to describe what designers do and how they interact with complex problems. These data can help improve designer‘s skills and other design insights. There are lacks of studies in design thinking in Iranian design studies. This issue causes defecting the understanding of design thinking principles and specifications....

متن کامل

Diagnostic and therapeutic challenges for dermatologists: What shall we do when we don’t know what to do?

What shall we do when we have done everything we could for the diagnosis and treatment of a patient, but were not successful? What shall we do when there is no definite treatment for a patient? What shall we do when we have no diagnosis or treatment for a patient? Some useful suggestions are presented here to get rid of these situations.

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015